I was a teenager at the time, albeit not yet able to
drive. That album should have been a
perfect fit with me. Then again, I was also the perfect age to
absorb KISS and Star Wars, and neither has ever made any sense to me. But The Knack, while I liked them, weren’t
one of my favorite bands, nor Get the Knack one of my favorite albums.
It may sound strange, but even as a typical American teenage
male circa late 70s, I found myself mildly offended by the band. In ways that I find pedestrian now, but were
a bit of a shock at the time. The main
offender was the song “Good Girls Don’t,” which featured these lines:
“And she makes you want to scream/wishing you could get
inside her pants” and
“And it's a teenage sadness/Everyone has got to taste/An
in-between age madness/That you know you can't erase/Til she's sitting on your
face.”
This was nearly a Top 10 single! Granted, there was a clean version for AM radio that substituted
“wishing she was giving you a chance” and “when she puts you in your place” for
the offending lines, but the FM rock stations, even in Pennsylvania, took
perverse delight in playing the “dirty” album version. Much like we constantly heard the line “who
the fuck are you” in “Who Are You” by The Who.
It wasn’t any sort of anti-authoritarian thrill to hear
these lines, although I surely dug The Who getting away with the “the F Word”
cartel of naughtiness. The Knack just
seemed cheesy. Cheesy in an Animal
House sort of way. Frat-boyish. Obvious.
But you know something?
These days, I look back on The Knack’s improbably massive success in the
late 70s, “Good Girls Don’t” in particular, and think they really nailed
something in American culture at the time.
Their popularity was improbable because power-pop bands just never made
it on that level in the later 70s. I’m
not sure if the term “power pop” even existed at that time. There were Beatlesque pop bands earlier in
the decade, like Badfinger or The Raspberries, who did have some level of
success. And you had The Cars who
started out very pop, but always had a “new wave” edge to their sound and
image. And Cheap Trick who, aside from
one massive Beatlesque hit single (“I Want You to Want Me”), veered towards a
more hard rock sound. British bands like Squeeze and Rockpile did put out perfect pop songs routinely, but again, were perceived more as "new wave" than pure pop bands. And plenty of
one-hit wonders. (Let’s discount Big
Star. They were nowhere near as popular
as their legend implies. I didn’t know
who they were at the time, and older kids who were
teenagers in the early 70s didn’t either.)
At that time, it wasn’t unusual for Beatlesque pop bands to
have one hit, then never quite get there again. Think “Starry Eyes” by The Records or “Girl of My Dreams” by BramTchaikovsky. The Knack breaking through
on the level of a massive hit album with multiple hit singles, while it didn’t
seem unusual at the time, was unusual.
The order of the day was disco (which admittedly was wearing itself out by
1979), the usual adult contemporary balladry of the 70s and AOR rock bands like
Journey and REO Speedwagon. (Many of
which I grew to dislike at the time, but have since come around and recognized
they were simply good rock bands with a knack for hit singles. Eddie Money knew what he was doing, and he
was good at it!)
It seemed like a bland time for music, but, boy, it
wasn’t. I even miss that sort of adult
contemporary market created by songs like “What a Fool Believes” by The Doobie
Brothers. (It gets called Yacht Rock
now, which is an apt description.) Look
at the Top 40 now. Is there anything
remotely like this? Everything now that
is popular on the singles chart is aimed squarely at kids, whereas a perusal of
the Top 40 back then would leave you with quite a few artists getting into their
30s, making music that both kids and adults bought. Cross-generational appeal is something I’ve learned to appreciate
with good to great pop music … and it no longer exists on that level.
(I should also note that sales have been so depleted by the
“music is free” revolution of the early 00’s that older rock artists will tend
to have a “massive” hit album the week of release, selling a minor fraction of
what they once did, followed by weeks of tailspin as every ageing fan of the
artist rushed out and bought a copy on
release date. Then again, if you
look at the Billboard top albums, it’s over-run with country acts … which are
essentially pop albums for older white fans who can stomach the stuff.)
That first Knack album was a one-off
hit on that level, because their follow-up, ... But the Little Girls Understand,
felt like a minor commercial and creative let-down. The songs really weren’t that far off, but there wasn’t a
breakout single like “My Sharona” and no follow-up singles like “Good Girls
Don’t.” It was a bit shocking how
quickly they fell from that level as everything after that, while interesting
and really not bad, just never got anywhere near the level of that first album.
I don’t think a pop song where the lead singer mentions a
girl sitting on his face has ever been done, before or after. (There is the notorious punk song, “Sit on My Face, Stevie Nicks,” but that was far from a hit.) There was a brutal honesty about that first Knack album … this is
how teenage guys were in the late 70s.
Horny. Raised in a decade where
getting laid was made to seem expected, and you were abnormal if you weren’t
caught up in all this, even as a teenager.
I can recall the endless stream of mediocre soft-core porn movies that pre-dated the
Porkies series, these odd movies about guys in high school trying to get laid
or just get a girlfriend. I can’t even
remember most of the titles, but they always seemed to be on TV, either on HBO
or floating around one of the New York or Philly stations on a weekend
afternoon, albeit heavily edited Lots of horizontally-striped
polo shirts, shag hair cuts, wire-frame glasses and fat best friends with a big
sense of humor. (One thing I've learned about life that these movies try desperately to negate: the world doesn't spin around nerds. They're not the profound voice of reason we should all listen to ... they're nerds.)
The Knack’s lead singer, Doug Fieger, caught quite a bit of
shit from critics at the time for operating on this level of the supposedly
leering pervert. Which was probably
true, but he was also channeling what it felt like to be a teenager and simply
doing what pop rock songwriters had been doing for decades before him: giving
the kids what they wanted, even if he was old enough to know better. And they
went nuts over songs about a frustrated guy dying to get laid … probably
because the theme hit much closer to home than critics or other more tasteful
adults knew or expected.
The band also caught hell for their marketing campaign, the
album which looked suspiciously like it could have been a mid-60’s Beatles
album cover. But, again, this was a
pure pop band. These were their
influences. They were simply paying
homage and trying to push things forward into that time of the 1970’s. And they surely did!
I would wager anymore that “My Sharona” comes on a
rock/oldies station, people think, this is so obvious, man, I was tired of
hearing this song by 1979. But I don’t
think the song or band really was that obvious. It’s a shame that bands like NRBQ who came along slightly earlier
and were a pure-pop band without that teen appeal couldn’t have made it just as
big. “Ridin’ in My Car” or “I Want You Bad” were pop songs that should have been massive hits, but I guess because the
band looked odd, were a little older and didn’t seem interested in playing the
game the way The Knack were willing to, they never quite got their due despite
being masters of their craft. Not to
knock The Knack. They deserve a lot
more credit than they’ve received over the years but will surely never get it, much like the protagonist of "Good Girls Don't" who is probably still waiting for someone to sit on his face.
1 comment:
William,
I read this one back to back with your piece on prog rock. doing so made me think how important place can be. i grew up in brockton, ma, a small city south of boston. we had all the yes albums and the ELP albums and the floyd albums, but it is also really true that we genuinely welcomed punk. the interest that yes and elp held for us waned as they got more and more self-serious. this was particularly so for my group because in boston, on the college stations, you could also hear miles. and compared to miles, yes and the rest sounded like they thought they were better than they really were. to have the clash and elvis and graham come along and blow that to pieces and to have right after that nick lowe and squeeze show us pop could be perfect and playful made us particularly disdainful of the progs (or maybe it was just a cheap way out of pretending that we liked king crimson).
what interests me is that we, and wbcn, by which we lived, loved the knack. why was that? i think for the exact reasons you give. and i think i was lucky to live in a place where i got to hear all this stuff on one station (bcn loved girl of my dreams and greg kihn too).
i have found, as i got older that either tastes set early or i just can't do prog. i love the early yes albums, and floyd eventually transcended prog as you say. the rest is a struggle for me, as it was when repeated on radiohead's the bends or beck's (and i normally love beck) seachange.
i don't know quite want it means. i recognize the musicanship on those prog albums but they don't reach me, and some, like kansas make me want to laugh and cry in despair alternately. but, as always your thoughts were compelling and fun to read
Post a Comment